Site Map

• Trade Union Home
• Services
  • Personal Injury
    • Slips, Trips and Falls Claims
    • Child Accident Claims
    • Accidents in Public Places Claims
    • Accident Abroad Claims
  • Road Traffic Accidents
    • Cycling Accident Claims
    • Motorbike Accident Claims
    • Pedestrian Accident Claims
    • Lorry and HGV Accident Claims
  • Serious Injury
    • Spinal Cord Injury Accident Claims
    • Brain Injury Claims
    • Amputation Accident Claims
    • Serious Burn Injury Claims
    • Serious Medical Injury Claims
    • Fatal Accident Claims
  • Asbestos Diseases
    • Mesothelioma Claims
    • Pleural Thickening Claims
    • Lung Cancer Claims
    • Asbestosis Claims
  • Medical Negligence
    • Cerebral Palsy and other Birth Injury Claims
    • Brain and Head Injury Claims
    • Medical Accident Amputation Claims
    • Spinal Injury Claims
    • Fatality Claims
    • Operation Claims
    • Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Scaphoid Fracture Claims
    • Hospital Complaints
    • Product Liability Claims
    • Vaginal and Rectal Mesh Implant Complications
    • Orthopaedic Claims
    • Doctor Negligence Claims
  • Industrial Diseases
    • Respiratory and Lung Disease Claims
    • Skin Disease Claims
    • Vibration Injury Claims
    • Occupational Cancer Claims
  • Accidents at Work
    • Slips, Trips and Falls at Work Claims
    • Workplace Assault Claims
    • Strain Injury Claims
    • Manual Handling Injury Claims
    • Needlestick Injury Claims
    • Crush Injury Claims
    • Factory Injury Claims
    • Farm Accident Claims
    • Construction Injury Claims
    • Forklift Truck Accident Claims
  • Employment Matters
    • Criminal and Professional Misconduct Advice
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Large-Scale Settlement Agreements
  • More Legal Services
    • Conveyancing
    • Wills and Probate
    • Family Member Services
    • Power of Attorney
    • Court of Protection and Deputyship
    • Client Support Coordinators
    • Professional Negligence
  • Actions Against the Police
• Trade Unions
  • Trade Unions
  • Advance
  • NAHT
  • Prospect and Bectu
  • USDAW
• Support and Advice
  • Support and Advice
  • How to Make a Claim
    • Fees and Payment
    • Client Care
  • Legal Guides and Resources
  • Our Clients
    • Our Personal Injury Clients
    • Our Road Traffic Accident Clients
    • Our Serious Injuries Clients
    • Our Asbestos Diseases Clients
    • Our Industrial Diseases Clients
    • Our Medical Negligence Clients
    • Our Accident at Work Clients
    • Our Employment Matters Clients
  • Charities and Support Groups
    • BrainNav
    • Headway
    • RoadPeace
    • The Spinal Injuries Association
    • Cerebra
    • Mesothelioma UK
    • Royal British Legion
    • Asbestos Victims Support Group Forums
    • Medical Negligence Support
    • Ian Paterson Independent Reviews
    • London Asbestos Support Awareness Group (LASAG)
    • Sling the Mesh
    • Show Racism the Red Card
    • Action Meso
    • UKABIF
    • Action on Asbestos
    • Asbestos Awareness and Support Cymru
    • Asbestos Support Central England
    • Cheshire Asbestos Victims Support Group
    • Cumbria & Lancashire Asbestos Support Advice Group
    • Derbyshire Asbestos Support Team
    • Greater Manchester Asbestos Victims Support Group
    • Northern TUC Asbestos Support and Campaign Group
    • Readley Asbestos and Mesothelioma Support
    • South West Asbestos Support Awareness Group
    • Yorkshire and Humberside Asbestos Support Group
    • Merseyside Asbestos Victims Support Group
• About
  • About Thompsons
    • The Thompson Foundation
  • Contact Us
  • Our Work with Trade Unions
  • Trade Union Law Group
  • Our People
    • Executive Board
    • Regional Managing Partners
    • Personal Injury Lawyers
    • Serious Injury Lawyers
    • Asbestos Disease Lawyers
    • Medical Negligence Lawyers
    • Industrial Disease Lawyers
    • Accident at Work Lawyers
    • Criminal Law Lawyers
    • Employment Rights Lawyers
    • Trade Union Lawyers
    • Professional Misconduct Lawyers
    • Costs Lawyers
  • Our Offices
    • London and Eastern
    • Midlands
    • North East
    • Northern Ireland
    • North West
    • South East
    • South West
    • Wales
    • Yorkshire
  • Our Pledge
  • Careers
    • Roles at Thompsons
  • Governance and Regulation
  • Our Experience in Public Inquiries
• News
  • News and Media
  • News Releases
    • Personal Injury News
    • Road Traffic Accident News
    • Serious Injury News
    • Asbestos Disease News
    • Industrial Disease News
    • Medical Negligence News
    • Accident at Work News
    • Employment Matters News
    • Our Firm News
    • Our Charity Work
    • COVID-19
    • Response to Minimum Service Levels Consultation
    • High Court refuses injunction by Warrington Borough Council to stop strike action by Unite members
    • PCS Announce First Legal Challenge of Government's Anti-Strike Laws
  • Commentary
    • Personal Injury Commentary
    • Road Traffic Accidents Commentary
    • Serious Injury Commentary
    • Asbestos Diseases Commentary
    • Industrial Diseases Commentary
    • Medical Negligence Commentary
    • Accidents at Work Commentary
    • Employment Matters Commentary
  • Briefings and Responses
    • Note on the Labour Standard provisions of the Draft Brexit Withdrawal Agreement
    • Home Office Consultation - Windrush Compensation Scheme
    • Ministry of Justice consultation - Review of legal aid for inquests
    • Department for Transport consultation - New cycling offences: causing death or serious injury when cycling
    • Ministry of Justice Consultation - Part 2 of the LASPO Act: Litigation Funding and Costs
    • Brexit: Guaranteeing workers' rights
    • Law Commission Consultation - Automated Vehicles
    • 'No deal' would be the worst possible outcome for workers' rights
    • Home Office Transparency in Supply Chains Consultation – Thompsons Solicitors’ response
    • Good Work Plan: establishing a new Single Enforcement Body for employment rights
    • Workers' rights and Boris Johnson's agreement
    • Good work plan: Consultation on measures to address one-sided flexibility
    • Retained EU Case Law: Consultation on the departure from retained EU case law by UK courts and tribunals
    • Department for Transport: Consultation on the regulation of Automated Lane Keeping System (ALKS)
    • Work & Pensions Committee: Health & Safety Executive Approach to Asbestos Management Examined
    • Supreme Court Judgment in Kostal Limited V Dunkley and Others
    • Trade Union Act 2016 Commencement Order No.4: New provisions coming into force
    • Trade Union Act 2016: Changes coming into force on 1 April 2022
  • Newsletters
    • Newsletter Subscription
  • Employment Law Review
    • Weekly Issue 597
      • Treading the boards
      • Constructing deductions
      • Parental status
    • Weekly Issue 598
      • Working on mental health
      • Iced Message
      • Meeting Failure
    • Weekly Issue 599
      • Reporting sexual harassment
      • Company Hearing
      • Public health transfer
    • Weekly Issue 600
      • Disability pay gap
      • Critical Assault
      • Detrimental compensation
    • Weekly Issue 601
      • Racial harassment inquiry
      • Context for harassment
      • Liability for motive
    • Weekly Issue 602
      • Good work plan
      • Witness statements
      • Less favourable half
    • Weekly Issue 603
      • Pay of top bosses
      • Taking leave
      • Working drivers
    • Weekly Issue 604
      • Work more flexibly
      • Tendency to steal
      • Disability plan
    • Weekly Issue 605
      • Calling for evidence
      • It could well happen
      • No relationship
    • Weekly Issue 606
      • Motherly protection
      • Reasonably foreseeable
      • Individual or inter-related?
    • Weekly Issue 607
      • Family friendly working
      • Collective unit
      • Equally unfavourable
    • Weekly Issue 608
      • Zero-hours, zero sum game
      • Reality “on the ground”
      • In need of protection
    • Weekly Issue 609
      • Gender pay gap reporting
      • Monthly statement
      • Associated companies
    • Weekly Issue 610
      • Holiday pay in a fix
      • Factual setting
      • Unbroken relationship
    • Weekly Issue 611
      • Confidential clauses
      • Employee Substitute
      • False rumours
    • Weekly Issue 612
      • Know your rights
      • Commonality of terms
      • Operational needs
    • Weekly Issue 613
      • Parental leave policies
      • Evidential burden
      • Reasonable dismissal
    • Weekly Issue 614
      • Employees should have a say on pay
      • Legitimating interests
      • Nursery ethos
    • Weekly Issue 615
      • Increase the NMW
      • Actual emails
      • Statutory dismissal
    • Weekly Issue 616
      • Payslips for all
      • Agency pay
      • Reality of risk
    • Weekly Issue 617
      • Protect whistleblowers
      • Personal transfer
      • Trouble brewing
    • Weekly Issue 618
      • Negotiating with employers
      • Valid warning
      • Redundant email
    • Weekly Issue 619
      • Failure to pay NMW
      • Reasonable and proper cause
      • Mistaken belief
    • Weekly Issue 620
      • Working flexibly
      • Seriously damaging
      • Hypothetical comparator
    • Weekly Issue 621
      • Increase in stress at work
      • Untainted by race
      • Fact of suspension
    • Weekly Issue 622
      • Mental health wait
      • Balancing act
      • School discrimination
    • Weekly Issue 623
      • Obesity at work
      • Return to work
      • No investigation
    • Weekly Issue 624
      • Trade union membership rises
      • Realisation of a breach
      • Open justice
    • Weekly issue 625
      • Discrimination cover-up
      • Work and rest
      • Dedicated adjustment
    • Weekly Issue 626
      • Low Pay Endemic
      • Variation on a bonus
      • Late Compliance
    • Weekly Issue 627
      • Outlaw sexual harassment
      • Effective time limit
      • Available for work
    • Weekly Issue 628
      • Roadmap to gender equality
      • Equal pay debt
      • Significant influence
    • Weekly Issue 629
      • Modern slavery consultation
      • Working time records
      • Patient forms
    • Weekly Issue 630
      • Labour market enforcment body
      • Men and maternity
      • Adverse consequences
    • Weekly Issue 631
      • Rise in demand for ACAS
      • Apt for incorporation
      • Links in the chain
    • Weekly Issue 632
      • Equality Act enforcement
      • Normal remuneration
      • Constructive knowledge
    • Weekly Issue 633
      • Insecurity of work
      • One-off inducement
      • Effect of harassment
    • Weekly Issue 634
      • More pay and increased holiday
      • Progressive disability
      • Series of deductions
    • Weekly Issue 635
      • Implausible data
      • No breach of rights
      • Genuine misunderstanding
    • Weekly Issue 636
      • Discrimination against young women
      • Self-interest or public interest?
      • Absence of means
    • Weekly Issue 637
      • New collective rights needed
      • Religious Manners
      • Removal Clause
    • Weekly Issue 638
      • Tackling class discrimination
      • Stereotyping assumptions
      • Not in the course of employment
    • Weekly Issue 639
      • Enforcing workers’ rights
      • In denial
      • Secret recording
    • Weekly Issue 640
      • Inflexible Workplaces
      • Minimum wage transfer
      • Agency Hours of Work
    • Weekly Issue 641
      • Mental ill-health at work
      • Immigration breach
      • Holiday Pay Calculator
    • Weekly Issue 642
      • Supply Chain Abuse
      • Reason for Dismissal
      • One-Off Acts
    • Weekly Issue 643
      • Returning to work
      • In the public interest
      • One-month extension
    • Weekly Issue 644
      • Menopause at work
      • Long-term effect
      • Workers and employees
    • Weekly Issue 645
      • Increase in older night workers
      • Contractual caps
      • Explicit refusal
    • Weekly Issue 646
      • Disability pay gap
      • Burden of proof
      • Improper behaviour
    • Weekly Issue 647
      • More executive women needed
      • Injustice and hardship
      • Shifting the burden
    • Weekly Issue 648
      • The stress of working
      • Limit on claims
      • Moral right
    • Weekly Issue 649
      • Pensions saving gender gap
      • Award of costs
      • Legal privilege
    • Weekly Issue 650
      • Unfair pay practices
      • Third-party harassment
      • Normal practice
    • Weekly Issue 651
      • Workplace equality and mental health
      • Personal contracts
      • Dismissal notification
    • Weekly Issue 652
      • Protect workers’ rights
      • Covert surveillance
      • Likely to succeed
    • Weekly Issue 653
      • NMW enforcement
      • Right evidence
      • Equal detriment
    • Weekly Issue 654
      • Negative impact of inflexible working
      • Hearing evidence
      • Mental processes
    • Weekly Issue 656
      • Rise in women’s working hours
      • Subjective belief
      • Poor performance
    • Weekly Issue 655
      • Bereavement leave
      • Acting allegation
      • Four-week carry over
    • Weekly Issue 657
      • Board diversity still low
      • Contributory fault
      • London allows
    • Weekly Issue 658
      • Naming and shaming rules
      • Substitute slot
      • Separate meetings
    • Weekly Issue 659
      • Problems with email
      • Reducing compensation
      • Individual blame
    • Weekly Issue 660
      • Outdated skills
      • Driver control
      • Grief reaction
    • Weekly Issue 661
      • Viral sickness
      • Foreign vessels
      • Immune from claims
    • Weekly Issue 662
      • Coronavirus (COVID-19) and SSP
      • Date of disability
      • Employer motive
    • Weekly Issue 663
      • Sick pay protection
      • Take note
      • Illegal contracting
    • Issue 664: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Special Edition
      • Help for the self-employed
      • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Retention Scheme
      • Emergency Volunteering Leave
    • Issue 665: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Specil Edition
      • Carry-over of holiday
      • Proof of absence from work
      • Stranded abroad
    • Issue 666: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Special Edition
      • Furlough scheme
      • Holiday carry over
      • Sick pay changes
    • Issue 667: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Special Edition
      • More advice on furlough leave
      • Paying contingent workers
      • Consumers stranded abroad
    • Issue 668: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Special Edition
      • Treasury Direction
      • Further clarifications and complications
      • Pensions: Job Retention Scheme
    • Issue 669: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Special Edition
      • Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme portal
      • Statutory sick pay and holidays
    • Issue 670: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Special Edition
      • The right to PPE
      • Silencing the whistleblowers
    • Issue 671: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Special Edition
      • Falling through the furlough gaps
      • Treasury publishes its Direction on self-employment scheme
    • Issue 672: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Special Edition
      • Government guidance on ‘Working Safely during COVID-19’
      • Guidance for construction and other outdoor workers
      • Guidance for those working in other people’s homes
      • Guidance for those working in labs and research facilities
      • Guidance for those working in offices and contact centres
      • Guidance for those working in factories, plants and warehouses
      • Guidance for those working in restaurants offering takeaway or delivery services
      • Guidance for those working in shops and branches
      • Guidance for those working in or from a vehicle
    • Issue 673: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Special Edition
      • Government guidance on ‘Holiday Entitlement and Pay during coronavirus COVID-19’
      • Government announces extension to the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme
    • Issue 674: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Special Edition
      • Test and trace
      • Changes to the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme
    • Issue 675: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Special Edition
      • Guidance on changes to the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme
      • Gaps in government support identified by Treasury Select Committee
    • Weekly Issue 676
      • Employers urged to be flexible
      • One-off act
      • Claim withdrawal
    • Weekly Issue 677
      • Protection against furlough fraud
      • Reasonable dismissal
      • Conciliation claims
    • Weekly Issue 678
      • Fall in workplace deaths
      • Criminal charge
      • Compensation lump sum
    • Issue 679: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Special Edition
      • Updated Treasury Direction published
      • Implications of the updated Treasury Direction on hours and pay
    • Weekly Issue 680
      • Workers need more protection
      • Missing page
      • Long-term benefits
    • Weekly Issue 681
      • Becoming COVID-Secure
      • Discriminatory motive
      • Health and safety
    • Weekly Issue 682
      • Protect whistleblowers
      • Out on a limb
      • Unclear dismissal
    • Weekly Issue 683
      • One step forward and two back
      • Discriminatory interview
      • Real right of substitution
    • Weekly Issue 684
      • Minimising redundancies
      • Last in a series
      • Putting the boot in
    • Weekly Issue 685
      • TUC calls for end of insecure work
      • Wrongful dismissal
      • Breach of confidentiality
    • Weekly Issue 686
      • Help with redundancies
      • Advantageous transfer
      • Unofficial work
    • Weekly Issue 687
      • Calls for reform of whistleblowing law
      • Case management
      • Marriage discrimination
    • Weekly Issue 688
      • Job protection plan
      • Liable for the remedy
      • Selective criteria
    • Weekly Issue 689
      • Not safe to return
      • Financial package
      • Anonymous dismissal
    • Weekly Issue 690
      • Tribunal changes
      • Because of, or but for?
      • No particular order
    • Weekly Issue 691
      • New coronavirus regulations
      • Job support scheme
      • Strike out
    • Weekly Issue 692
      • Threat of redundancy
      • Job Retention Bonus Scheme
      • A number of transferees
    • Weekly Issue 693
      • Labour market enforcement
      • Extension of the Job Support Scheme
      • Rare case
    • Weekly Issue 694
      • Securing personal data
      • Unfair selection
      • Historical reason
    • Weekly Issue 695
      • Defrauding government support schemes
      • Further changes to the Job Support Scheme
      • No longer trusted
    • Weekly Issue 696
      • The need for good work
      • Changes to the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme
      • Unknown risks
    • Weekly Issue 697
      • A whistleblowing pandemic
      • Reasonable redundancy
      • Effect of beliefs
    • Weekly Issue 698
      • Health and safety for workers
      • Collective conciliation
      • Strike out
    • Weekly Issue 699
      • Backwards on equality
      • Further extension to the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme
      • Continuing consequences
    • Weekly Issue 700
      • Extension to early conciliation
      • Indirect disadvantage
      • Transnational penalty
    • Weekly Issue 701
      • The consulting room
      • Periods of employment
      • Ultimate control
    • Weekly Issue 702
      • Call to reform sick pay
      • Repudiatory acceptance
      • Fair-minded observer
    • Weekly Issue 703
      • Furlough for working parents
      • The “plus” factor
      • Taking protective steps
    • Weekly Issue 704
      • Changes to furlough support
      • Notice of termination
      • Degree of control
    • Weekly Issue 709
      • Public sector exit payments
      • Reasons for delay
      • Particular claim
    • Weekly Issue 705
      • Domestic Abuse
      • Liability for award
      • Whistleblowing disclosure requirement
    • Weekly Issue 706
      • Fired and then re-hired
      • Prejudiced misrepresentation
      • Irrelevant Redundancy
    • Weekly Issue 707
      • Job retention scheme extended again
      • Facts and allegations
      • Agency vacancies
    • Weekly Issue 708
      • More testing but not enough pay
      • Discrimination remedy
      • Trade union activity
    • Weekly Issue 710
      • Focus on the law
      • Back office role
      • Contract starting point
    • Weekly Issue 711
      • High unemployment rates for BAME workers
      • Difference in treatment
      • Affirming a contract
    • Weekly Issue 712
      • More flexible jobs needed
      • Comparing childcare responsibilties
      • Protecting disabled workers
    • Weekly Issue 713
      • Increase in tribunal figures
      • Jab or job - employers exploit vaccine rollout
      • Lost years
    • Weekly Issue 714
      • Sleep-in care workers lose out
      • Furlough scheme one year on
      • Not a protected act
    • Weekly Issue 715
      • Covid risk to workers
      • Refresher training
      • Camera angle
    • Weekly Issue 716
      • A safe return to work
      • Priority pension schemes
      • Lack of evidence
    • Weekly Issue 717
      • Coronavirus technology
      • Legal protection
      • Tribunals are courts
    • Weekly Issue 718
      • Deadly risks for insecure workers
      • Free from bias
      • Transfer allocation
    • Weekly Issue 719
      • Drivers are workers
      • Auxiliary aids
      • Reasonable prospect of success
    • Weekly Issue 720
      • Improve workers’ rights
      • Successor employer
      • Uplift claim
    • Weekly Issue 721
      • Coronavirus and depression
      • Awake or asleep
      • Unpaid holiday
    • Weeky Issue 722
      • Underpaying the low paid
      • Common terms test
      • Strike out interests
    • Weekly Issue 723
      • Covid deaths at work being under-reported
      • Material differences
      • Carers are workers
    • Weekly Issue 724
      • Trade union membership growing
      • Discriminatory dismissal
      • Severing transfers
    • Weekly Issue 725
      • Direct effect
      • Drivers ruled as workers
      • Individual corporation
    • Weekly Issue 726
      • Certification officer changes
      • Maternity allowance
      • Long term events
    • Weekly Issue 727
      • Disabled by Covid
      • Awarding compensation
      • Overarching contracts
    • Weekly Issue 728
      • No automatic right
      • Health and safety activities
      • Fundamentally breached
    • Weekly Issue 729
      • BME workers lose out
      • Mindful dismissal
      • Trade union activities
    • Weekly Issue 730
      • Increase in workers' deaths
      • Directly effective
      • Gender critical
    • Weekly Issue 731
      • Tribunals at crisis point
      • Interim discrimination
      • Relevant factors
    • Weekly Issue 732
      • Duty to prevent sexual harassment
      • Making adjustments
      • Fair hearing
    • Weekly Issue 733
      • TUC urges ban on umbrella companies
      • Allocation of hours
      • No union recognition
    • Weekly Issue 734
      • Breaching NMW law
      • Whistling in the dark
      • At sea on holiday
    • Weekly Issue 735
      • Paid time off for vaccinations
      • Post-dated dismissal
      • Continuing consequences
    • Weekly Issue 736
      • Low pay, big profits
      • Fair trial impossible
      • Omitting to act
    • Weekly Issue 737
      • Extension to temporary right to work checks
      • Undifferentiated signs
      • Reasonable to dismiss
    • Weekly Issue 738
      • Specifically flexible
      • Effect of impairment
      • Discretionary policy
    • Weekly Issue 739
      • Low paid workers bear the brunt
      • Adjustable pay rate
      • Burden of discrimination
    • Weekly Issue 740
      • Less job satisfaction for low earners
      • Suitable employment
      • Acts of harassment
    • Weekly Issue 741
      • Day one flexibility
      • Fair warning
      • No right of appeal
    • Weekly Issue 742
      • Epidemic of workplace sexual harassment
      • Inducement or implementation
      • Part-time status
    • Weekly Issue 743
      • Discrimination Against Older Workers
      • Breach of Statutory Right
      • Right of Appeal
    • Weekly Issue 744
      • Impact of menopause
      • No hidden motive
      • Whistleblowing claim
    • Weekly Issue 745
      • Hybrid working a hit
      • Caring discrimination
      • Redeployment roles
    • Weekly Issue 746
      • Unlawful inducements
      • Enhanced redundancy payment
      • Tainted by discrimination
    • Weekly Issue 747
      • Big increase in gig economy workers
      • Same policy, different decision
      • Structured approach
    • Weekly Issue 748
      • Don’t fire and rehire
      • Reasoned analysis
      • Special circumstances
    • Weekly Issue 749
      • Ratification of convention on violence
      • Personal substitution
      • Implication of a term
    • Weekly Issue 750
      • Where is the employment bill?
      • Knowledge of disability
      • Perversity itself
    • Weekly Issue 751
      • Sick pay scandal
      • Specific allegation
      • Discrimination by association
    • Weekly Issue 752
      • Hybrid working
      • Automatic dismissal
      • Industrial action protection
    • Weekly Issue 753
      • Disability consultation
      • Two minute stand-by
      • Expenses and deductions
    • Weekly Issue 754
      • Temporary extension to sick pay period
      • In person evidence
      • Critical evaluation
    • Weekly Issue 755
      • Tribunal claims taking a year to be heard
      • Duty of fairness
      • Constructively unfair
    • Weekly Issue 756
      • UK's sick pay problem
      • Levels of discomfort
      • Flexible extension
    • Weekly Issue 757
      • Threat to workers’ rights
      • Employment status of director/shareholder
      • Sole reason
    • Weekly Issue 758
      • Dismissal for refusal to return was unfair
      • Holiday pay
      • Practical joker
    • Weekly Issue 759
      • No discrimination against illegal workers
      • Franchised substitute
      • Internal grievance
    • Weekly Issue 760
      • Bereavement rights at work
      • Contractual consideration
      • Lawful mandatory vaccination
    • Weekly Issue 761
      • Uncontrolled worker surveillance
      • Black cab driver not a worker
      • Specific harassment
    • Weekly Issue 762
      • Slow progress to gender equality
      • One-off act
      • Post-dated discrimination
    • Weekly Issue 763
      • Zero-hours contracts: insecure and racially skewed
      • Minor error
      • Discriminatory job interest
    • Weekly Issue 764
      • Mass sackings in post-Brexit Britain
      • No right of application
      • Quantum meruit
    • Weekly Issue 765
      • In defence of check-off
      • Grounded reasons
      • Minimum obligations
    • Weekly Issue 766
      • Protecting all workers
      • Confidential whistleblowing
      • Limiting justice
    • Weekly Issue 767
      • Race and flexibility
      • Agreeing terms
      • Covenant by design
    • Weekly Issue 768
      • Risks of worker exploitation
      • Correct assessment
      • Vexatious claims
    • Weekly Issue 769
      • Likely increase in redundancies
      • Detrimental effect
      • Distorted finding
    • Weekly Issue 770
      • Disability pay gap narrows
      • Allegations of bias
      • Materially different
    • Weekly Issue 771
      • Menopausal women at work
      • Anonymised disposal
      • Industrial action detriment
    • Weekly Issue 772
      • Minimum wage for seafarers
      • Reasonable detriment
      • Wrong comparators
    • Weekly Issue 773
      • Fifth of employers support “no jab, no job”
      • Public interest disclosure
      • Reasonable tribunal decision
    • Weekly Issue 774
      • Fall in trade union membership
      • Reasonable offence
      • Last straw doctrine
    • Weekly Issue 775
      • Tripling of menopause complaints
      • Statutory tests
      • Objective judgment
    • Weekly Issue 776
      • Avoid “one size fits all” hybrid working
      • No strike-out
      • Serious and imminent danger
    • Weekly Issue 777
      • New guidance for pregnant workers
      • Certification rules
      • Identifying constructive dismissal
    • Weekly Issue 778
      • Increase in damages against trade unions
      • Dismissal without notice
      • Exaggerated claims
    • Weekly Issue 779
      • Threat to workers’ rights from trade talks
      • Third stage test
      • Restraining a key competitor
    • Weekly Issue 780
      • Protected philosophical beliefs
      • Transcript recordings
      • Maximum uplift
    • Weekly Issue 781
      • Increased demand for ACAS services
      • Giving up collective rights
      • Separate numbers
    • Weekly Issue 782
      • Paid neonatal leave
      • Protection undermined
      • Belief and lack of belief protection
    • Weekly Issue 783
      • Challenge to new agency regulations
      • Issues of fairness
      • No diplomatic immunity
    • Weekly Issue 784
      • European work-life balance
      • Perception of bias
      • Least burdensome
    • Weekly Issue 785
      • More rights needed for zero-hours workers
      • State immunity
      • Permanent does not mean forever
    • Weekly Issue 786
      • Harrods threatens use of agency staff
      • Contractual right to check-off
      • Access to insurance policy
    • Weekly Issue 787
      • Penalty for CV fraud
      • Calculating holiday pay
      • Political neutrality
    • Weekly Issue 788
      • Collective strength matters
      • Fairly disclosed
      • Awareness of time limits
    • Weekly Issue 789
      • Suspension of staff
      • Same treatment
      • Relevant circumstances
    • Weekly Issue 790
      • Briefing workers
      • Fundamental breach
      • Legal privilege
    • Weekly Issue 791
      • End of EU rights
      • Case management decision
      • Pre-conditions
    • Weekly Issue 792
      • Addressing mental health at work
      • Indefinite disclosure
      • Confiscation of earnings
    • Weekly Issue 793
      • Improving working conditions in Europe
      • Refusal to extend time
      • Considerable caution
    • Weekly Issue 794
      • Inadequate support for menopausal women
      • Reasons for reducing compensation
      • Job connection to GB
    • Weekly Issue 795
      • Carer’s Leave Bill passes second reading
      • Contractual issue
      • Identifiable practice
    • Weekly Issue 796
      • Low pay for night work
      • Only one number
      • Without privilege
    • Weekly Issue 797
      • Low pay facing disabled workers
      • Extension of time
      • Disciplinary policy
    • Weekly Issue 798
      • Widespread workplace discrimination
      • Wide discretion
      • Prior consultation
    • Weekly Issue 799
      • HSE guidance on accessible workplaces
      • Settlement terms
      • Incomplete investigation
    • Weekly Issue 800
      • EU Retained Law Bill not "fit for purpose"
      • Shared incentives
      • Reasonable adjustments not required
    • Weekly Issue 801
      • Potential pitfalls of flexible working
      • Interim statement
      • Not legally enforceable
    • Weekly Issue 802
      • Low pay facing disabled workers
      • Boundaries of behaviour
      • Disappearing dismissal
    • Weekly Issue 803
      • High Court to hear challenge to strike breaking regulations
      • Stigma of the whistle blower
      • Duty to make adjustments
    • Weekly Issue 804
      • Minimum service levels
      • Two year dismissal rule
      • Intention of the parties
    • Weekly Issue 805
      • Calculating holiday pay
      • Slotting in
      • Calculating a costs order
    • Weekly Issue 806
      • Rights of millions of workers at risk
      • Evaluation of jobs
      • Compulsory compensation
    • Weekly Issue 807
      • Rejection of menopause recommendations
      • Future claims included
      • Contractual limitation period
    • Weekly Issue 808
      • Third party harassment
      • Pandemic concerns
      • Marital comparator
    • Weekly Issue 809
      • Doubling down on data
      • Post-Brexit works councils
      • Application to amend
    • Weekly Issue 810
      • Protection of human rights at work
      • Material remedies
      • Disability aware
    • Weekly Issue 811
      • Minimum service levels bill “not fit for purpose”
      • Direct discrimination
      • Bad faith victimisation
    • Weekly Issue 812
      • Regulation helps business
      • Good attendance
      • Failure to bounce back
    • Weekly Issue 813
      • More criticism of minimum service levels bill
      • No job available
      • Disciplinary process reopened
    • Weekly Issue 814
      • Impunity for rogue employers
      • Discriminatory dismissal
      • No longer fair
    • Weekly Issue 815
      • Low pay consultation
      • Redundancy procedure
      • Contract termination
    • Weekly Issue 816
      • Whistleblowing review
      • Substituting a view
      • Criminal conviction
    • Weekly Issue 817
      • Autism awareness at work
      • Sufficiently particularised
      • Exceptional delay
    • Weekly Issue 818
      • Discrimination of LGBT+ young adults
      • Not disability discrimination
      • No realistic prospect of success
    • Weekly Issue 819
      • Gathering ethnicity data
      • Res judicata
      • Saving costs
    • Weekly Issue 820
      • Record levels of sickness
      • Failure to mitigate
      • Basic contractual hours
    • Weekly Issue 821
      • Legal entitlement to customer tips
      • Sex discrimination exemption
      • Means of communication
    • Weekly Issue 822
      • Sexual harassment rife at work
      • Linking claims
      • General reconsideration
    • Weekly Issue 823
      • Proposals to change workers rights
      • Conciliation complications
      • Vexatious litigants
    • Weekly Issue 824
      • New rights for parents and carers
      • Fantastical outcome
      • Furlough pay
    • Weekly Issue 825
      • Gender pensions gap
      • Vicarious liability
      • Out of time
    • Weekly Issue 826
      • Regulation of umbrella companies
      • Knowledge is key
      • Serious and imminent danger
    • Weekly Issue 827
      • Triple whammy of insecure work
      • Company bias
      • Specifying tribunal complaints
    • Weekly Issue 828
      • Barriers facing disabled workers
      • Too narrow a pool
      • Pandemic dismissal
    • Weekly Issue 829
      • Low expectations of LGBT+ workers
      • Examination chances
      • Contractual subscriptions
    • Weekly Issue 830
      • The ethnicity motherhood pay penalty
      • Compensatory shortfall
      • Level of paid annual leave
    • Weekly Issue 831
      • New ACAS code on flexible working
      • Corrupted information
      • Different disability approach
    • Weekly Issue 832
      • Pregnant then screwed
      • Grounds for review
      • Protecting beliefs
    • Weekly Issue 833
      • Insecure work
      • Perception of harassment
      • Case clarification
    • Weekly Issue 834
      • Insecure work
      • Dismissal meeting
      • Interests of justice
    • Weekly Issue 835
      • Job challenges for women on low income
      • Dual employment
      • European Works Councils
    • Weekly Issue 836
      • Higher pay for multi-millionaires
      • Repeated dismissal
      • Something arising
    • Weekly Issue 837
      • Childcare workforce crisis
      • New terms and conditions
      • Delayed claim
    • Weekly Issue 838
      • Risks from AI
      • Parties to the contract
      • Quick dismissal
    • Weekly Issue 839
      • Workplace dress codes
      • Rectifying a mistake
      • Online application
    • Weekly Issue 840
      • Predicting working hours
      • Financial gain claim
      • Coping vs avoidance
    • Weekly Issue 841
      • Managing the menopause
      • Statutory waymarks
      • Single incident
    • Weekly Issue 842
      • Unqualified managers
      • Full participation
      • Transfer of share option plan
    • Weekly Issue 843
      • New law against sexual harassment
      • Geographical location
      • Mutual consent
    • Weekly Issue 844
      • Code of practice on predictable working hours
      • Holiday pay deductions
      • Chain of causation
    • Weekly Issue 845
      • Obstacles facing women returners
      • Failure to comply
      • Reasonable refusal
    • Weekly Issue 846
      • ILO calls for improved worker protection
      • Providing effective care
      • Not disadvantaged by an advantage
    • Weekly Issue 847
      • Proposal to use agency workers during strike action
      • Clarity in complaints
      • Not closely connected
    • Weekly Issue 848
      • Rise in stress-related illness at work
      • Unconditional Authority
      • Amendment Application
    • Weekly Issue 849
      • Zero-hours contracts
      • Actual comparators
      • Claim form as a whole
    • Weekly Issue 850
      • Acas data on tribunal disputes
      • Discrimination by association
      • Disclosure context
    • Weekly Issue 851
      • New workers' rights in 2024
      • Intention to resign
      • Inability to return
    • Weekly Issue 852
      • Holiday pay guidance
      • Refusal of union recognition
      • Restraint of trade
    • Weekly Issue 853
      • Flexible working code
      • Partnership Status
      • Contract affirmation
    • Weekly Issue 854
      • Widespread age discrimination
      • Settling protected disclosures
      • Early consultation
    • Weekly Issue 855
      • Burnout Britain
      • Status of temporary pilot
      • Passage of time
    • Weekly Issue 856
      • Return of tribunal fees
      • Diplomatic immunity
      • No statutory cap
    • Weekly Issue 857
      • Women in construction
      • Redundancy notification
      • Reasonable time limit
    • Weekly Issue 858
      • Rise in whistleblowing
      • Particular complaint
      • No extension of time
    • Weekly Issue 859
      • Menopause and the Equality Act
      • Contradictory dates
      • Extension discretion
    • Weekly Issue 860
      • Unequal Perceptions
      • External Whistleblowers
      • Bad Faith Claim
    • Weekly Issue 861
      • Sharing mental health information
      • Associate worker
      • Transfer of rights
    • Weekly Issue 862
      • Unaffordable paternity rights
      • Justifying discrimination
      • Long term planning
    • Weekly Issue 863
      • Record numbers on zero-hours contracts
      • Green and grey differences
      • Constructive dismissal
    • Weekly Issue 864
      • Court ruling highlights risks of settlement agreements for union members
      • Court ruling on outsourced workers’ pay disparities
      • EAT decision on discriminatory constructive dismissal
    • Weekly issue 865
      • Understanding the 1 July changes to TUPE for small business
      • EAT Ruling on Individual Liability in Discrimination Claims
      • Virgin Atlantic Redundancy Tribunal Ruling
      • EAT Rules Volunteer Entitled to Worker Rights for Paid Activities
    • Weekly Issue 866
      • Labour’s Proposed Employment Rights Bill: A Step Forward for Workers’ Rights
      • Trade Unions and Industrial Action
      • Day One Right Not to Be Unfairly Dismissed
      • Restrictions on Fire and Rehire
      • Thresholds for Redundancy Consultation
      • Zero Hours Contracts and Predictability
      • Right to Request Flexible Working by Default
    • Weekly Issue 867
      • Government Repeals Strikes Act to Strengthen Workers’ Rights and Public Services
      • New Legislation on Tips Allocation Set to Come into Force
      • Key Takeaways from Mansfield Care Ltd v Newman: TUPE, Redundancy, and Worker Rights Explained
      • Mr. J. Wharton v. Sheehan Haulage: Key Lessons on Wage Dispute Timing and Tribunal Fairness
    • Weekly Issue 868
      • Next Workers Win Equal Pay Claims: What This Means for Employees
      • British Airways PLC v Rollett and Others
      • Miss G Treadwell v Barton Turns Development Ltd
    • Weekly Issue 869
      • New Legal Duty for Employers to Prevent Sexual Harassment in the Workplace
      • English Nationalism and Employment Law: Tribunal Case Study
      • Case Study: Disability Discrimination in Mr. Raymond Cairns v. Royal Mail Group Ltd
    • Weekly Issue 870
      • Pension Pot Needed for Basic Retirement Soars by 60%
      • Unfair Dismissal and Whistleblowing: Mr. Dowding v The Character Group Plc
      • Constructive Unfair Dismissal and Victimisation: Dr. McInerney v Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS
      • Appeal Extension Granted in Discrimination Case: AB v University of East London
    • Weekly Issue 871
      • Worker Protection (Amendment of Equality Act 2010) Act 2023 comes into force on 26 October
      • Case study: Dr A Moghaddam v University of Oxford and Others [2024] EAT 156
      • Case Study: Mr Ian Escudier v Coca-Cola Europacific Partners Great Britain Ltd [2024] EAT 145
    • Weekly Issue 872
      • Government Takes Action to Curb Tax Avoidance by Umbrella Companies 
      • Case study: Dr. Nigel MacLennan v The British Psychological Society (BPS) – Whistleblowing Rights of Charity Trustees 
      • Case Study: Miss T Amber v West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service (WYFRS) 
    • Weekly Issue 873
      • New Accountability Measures for NHS Trust Leaders in Failing Hospitals
      • Case Summary: National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers & Another v Tyne and Wear Passenger Transport Executive t/a Nexus [2024] UKSC 37
      • Case Summary: Gallagher v McKinnon’s Auto and Tyres Ltd [2024] EAT 174
      • Case Summary: Mr. Steven Connor v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [2024] EAT 175
    • Weekly Issue 874
      • Employment Law Review Roundup
    • Weekly Issue 875
      • Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024: New Employment Tribunal rules come into force
      • Case Summary: Ms. Anne-Marie Alexis v Westminster Drug Project [2024] EAT 188
      • Case Summary: London United Busways Ltd v (1) Mr. V. De Marchi (2) Abellio London Ltd [2024] EAT 191
      • Case Summary: Sadia Shakil v Samsons Ltd [2024] EAT 192 
    • Weekly Issue 876
      • New Neonatal Care Leave and Pay: Support for Parents from Day One
      • Case Summary: Sivanandan v Independent Office for Police Conduct & Penna PLC [2025] EAT 7
      • Case Summary: Abel Estate Agent Ltd and Others v Elizabeth Reynolds [2025] EAT 6
      • Case Summary: Morais and Others v Ryanair DAC [2025] EWCA Civ 19
    • Weekly Issue 877
      • New Guidance Issued on Taking Oral Evidence from Overseas Witnesses
      • TUC Highlights Zero-Hours Contract Crisis as Workers Remain Stuck in Insecurity
      • Eddie Stobart Ltd v Miss Caitlin Graham [2025] EAT 14
      • Ms Carol McMahon v AXA ICAS Ltd [2025] EAT 8
    • Weekly Issue 878
      • TUC and Hope Not Hate research reports strong public support for Employment Rights Bill
      • Case Study: Higgs v Farmor’s School
      • Case Study: Marston (Holdings) Ltd v A Perkins [2025] EAT 20
    • Weekly Issue 879
      • Government Updates Employment Rights Bill Amendment Paper
      • Case Summary: Roofe-Stewart v MacIntyre Care Ltd – Disability Discrimination Appeal
      • Case Summary: Dr Mark Ter-Berg v Mr Parul Malde & Dr Colin Hancock – Worker Status Appeal
      • Case Summary: Tesco Stores Ltd v Ms K Element & Ors – Equal Pay and Expert Evidence Appeal
    • Weekly Issue 880
      • Government Opens Consultation on Ethnicity and Disability Pay Gap Reporting
      • Brian Gourlay v West Dunbartonshire Council [2025] EAT 29
      • Busways Ltd v Mr O Sener [2025] EAT 37
      • Ofsted v Hewston [2025] EWCA Civ 250
    • Weekly Issue 881
      • For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers
      • Sullivan v Isle of Wight Council – Job Applicants and Whistleblowing Protections
      • Case Report: F v J – Anonymity in Disability Discrimination Proceedings Background:
      • Case Report: Kinch v Compassion in World Farming International – Strike Out and Affirmation in Constructive Dismissal Claims
    • Weekly Issue 882
      • Cable News International Inc v Ms Saima Bhatti
      • Mr Neeraj Handa v The Station Hotel (Newcastle) Ltd and Others
      • Biddulph v Eastern Counties Leather
      • Poll Shows Strong Public Support for Employment Rights Bill
    • Weekly Issue 883
      • Disability, Belief and the Right to Refuse Mask-Wearing
      • Redundancy Pay and Polkey Deductions 
      • Equality Act Guidance to be Updated Following Supreme Court Ruling on Definition of Sex
    • Weekly Issue 884
      • Hendy Group Ltd v Mr Daniel Kennedy – Redundancy and Alternative Employment
      • Mr K Hindmarch v North East Ambulance NHS Foundation Trust – Reasonable Adjustments and PPE
      • Polling Highlights High Rates of Bullying and Discrimination Faced by Disabled Workers
  • Campaigns
    • Hands Off: Workers’ Rights
    • Standing with Unions
    • Under the COSHH
    • Asbestos: Past, but present
    • Patients Before Profits
    • International Campaigns
  • Our Press Office
• Covid-19 Hub
• Help and support during the claims process
• Trade Union Home
• Thompsons Represents RMT and Unite in Supreme Court Victory on Collective Pay Dispute
• Supreme Court judgment upholding union’s right to bring claim as a third party following the removal of check-off arrangements  
• Supreme Court rules in favour of USDAW workers over Tesco ‘Fire and Rehire’ scheme